[sIFR3-dev] CSS declarations versus properties

[Mark Wubben]

On May 27, 2006, at 5:26 AM, danilocelic wrote:

> Mark Wubben wrote:
>> Is this desired, or should options like leading, but also  
>> sharpness  and thickness, be specified as properties, like:
>> 	leading: -10
>> What is the easiest way to configure this?
>
> How long is the current (and new) set of parameters that are being  
> passed in? If it's quite long, then adding more may make it harder  
> for folks to get started because they see a long long list of  
> decisions they have to make.

Defining them in the client side CSS config or in the JS config  
wouldn't really matter with regards to how many options there are.  
The question is, what is easier?

>
> However I can see that offering the option would be good, so from  
> that I guess it would depend on how the defaults are defined. Will  
> they be set in the FLA, or would they come from CSS and be  
> overridden in the parameters passed in?

You can specify defaults in the FLA, which will be overridden by the  
parameters (the client side config). The defaults are sensible, though.

--
Mark Wubben
http://novemberborn.net/