From mark at novemberborn.net Tue May 2 10:47:51 2006 From: mark at novemberborn.net (Mark Wubben) Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 12:47:51 +0200 Subject: [sIFR3-dev] sIFR and the Eolas-patch Message-ID: Hi, It's been a while since I've had time to work on sIFR. I've done some interesting things though in the past week, more about that later. Unfortunately, there seem to be a few issues with the recent Eolas patch Microsoft rolled out. Please read my post on the issue at . Kind regards, -- Mark Wubben http://novemberborn.net/ From mark at novemberborn.net Thu May 11 20:06:44 2006 From: mark at novemberborn.net (Mark Wubben) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 22:06:44 +0200 Subject: [sIFR3-dev] sIFR & Eolas, Testing the Patching Message-ID: <9406A270-840A-403B-BC85-208C590A16E6@novemberborn.net> Hi, I've got some updates on the problems after the Eolas patch was rolled out by Microsoft, including a patch to sIFR. Please see . Kind regards, -- Mark Wubben http://novemberborn.net/ From mark at novemberborn.net Mon May 22 21:33:51 2006 From: mark at novemberborn.net (Mark Wubben) Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 23:33:51 +0200 Subject: [sIFR3-dev] Alpha release! Message-ID: Hey! I just released the alpha of sIFR 3. Please head to for the juicy details. Kind regards, -- Mark Wubben http://novemberborn.net/ From mark at novemberborn.net Thu May 25 09:53:29 2006 From: mark at novemberborn.net (Mark Wubben) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 11:53:29 +0200 Subject: [sIFR3-dev] sIFR 2.0.2 Message-ID: <0A5BB353-8F64-41F6-8AB5-DF45ED99A06B@novemberborn.net> Hi, I've just released the 2.0.2, containing fixes for the "Eolas patch" related problems. You can find out more at . Kind regards, -- Mark Wubben http://novemberborn.net/ From mark at novemberborn.net Fri May 26 12:49:01 2006 From: mark at novemberborn.net (Mark Wubben) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 14:49:01 +0200 Subject: [sIFR3-dev] Flash Background Images? Message-ID: Hi, Does anybody know how to add background images to a Flash movie? I'd like to add that to sIFR, but I can't figure out how to do it. Thanks! -- Mark Wubben http://novemberborn.net/ From mark at novemberborn.net Fri May 26 20:05:43 2006 From: mark at novemberborn.net (Mark Wubben) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 22:05:43 +0200 Subject: [sIFR3-dev] CSS declarations versus properties Message-ID: <8396DE78-F359-4C52-9E13-C630B68D8031@novemberborn.net> Hi, Right now, you specify leading in a client side "CSS rule", like: css: { '.sIFR-root': { 'background-color': '#DCDCDC', leading: -10 } } Is this desired, or should options like leading, but also sharpness and thickness, be specified as properties, like: leading: -10 What is the easiest way to configure this? -- Mark Wubben http://novemberborn.net/ From mark at novemberborn.net Fri May 26 22:01:33 2006 From: mark at novemberborn.net (Mark Wubben) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 00:01:33 +0200 Subject: [sIFR3-dev] Using SVN and About the Beta Message-ID: <0D2ABE65-6B8E-4FF7-B793-C00525C72863@novemberborn.net> Hi, I've just posted a quick how-to on using the latest sIFR version, and a to-do list for the beta. You can read it at . Have a nice weekend! -- Mark Wubben http://novemberborn.net/ From mark at novemberborn.net Sat May 27 08:40:34 2006 From: mark at novemberborn.net (Mark Wubben) Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 10:40:34 +0200 Subject: [sIFR3-dev] CSS declarations versus properties In-Reply-To: <4477C6EC.2020702@shimmerphase.com> References: <8396DE78-F359-4C52-9E13-C630B68D8031@novemberborn.net> <4477C6EC.2020702@shimmerphase.com> Message-ID: <9C77E75F-8502-41BB-BAD5-01F6A5D6FACC@novemberborn.net> On May 27, 2006, at 5:26 AM, danilocelic wrote: > Mark Wubben wrote: >> Is this desired, or should options like leading, but also >> sharpness and thickness, be specified as properties, like: >> leading: -10 >> What is the easiest way to configure this? > > How long is the current (and new) set of parameters that are being > passed in? If it's quite long, then adding more may make it harder > for folks to get started because they see a long long list of > decisions they have to make. Defining them in the client side CSS config or in the JS config wouldn't really matter with regards to how many options there are. The question is, what is easier? > > However I can see that offering the option would be good, so from > that I guess it would depend on how the defaults are defined. Will > they be set in the FLA, or would they come from CSS and be > overridden in the parameters passed in? You can specify defaults in the FLA, which will be overridden by the parameters (the client side config). The defaults are sensible, though. -- Mark Wubben http://novemberborn.net/