[sIFR3-dev] Assorted annoyances :)

Fredrik Bränström branstrom at gmail.com
Sun Aug 6 19:49:50 GMT 2006


On 8/6/06, Mark Wubben <mark at novemberborn.net> wrote:
>
> Apologies for the late reply, I need to check my "need to reply" box
> more often...


No sweat.

On Aug 3, 2006, at 9:23 AM, Fredrik Bränström wrote:
>
> > I exported my v8 .swf with a dropshadow, at around 70% strength.
> > This makes sIFR display the text with a faint dropshadow by
> > default, as intended. However, it doesn't allow adjusting it with
> > settings in the kwargs objects. It reacts when I set strength: 1,
> > but not when I set it to strength: 0.5 (tried .5 too) or anything
> > below 1. Even strength: 0 doesn't remove the effect.
>
> I'm not sure if sIFR can override filters defined through the Flash
> IDE. Probably best to define through script (either in Options.as or
> on JavaScript).


I would, if it weren't for the nicer shadow I got when I set in before
exporting the Flash. I also assumed sending the filter definition to every
sIFRed element through JS would just mean a slowdown (probably not
noticeable though), as opposed to baking them into the SWF itself.

I'll put out the fixed version (r120 or above), could you try again
> using the actual fraction?


I will.

> Something else: I looked at an old test case... it is quite clear
> > that the cut-off bug looks the way it does because of the .swf
> > textfield dimensions, the textfield doesn't get correctly resized
> > internally by the ActionScript, I guess...
>
> That'd be weird, as it's always resized to the height and width of
> the text. Does this still occur with the latest revisions (r119 or
> above)?


 I don't think so, actually. I'll look closer when I'm playing with it.

> On yet another topic (I guess I should ideally send separate
> > mails...), wouldn't it be possible to set the width of the Flash to
> > exactly what's needed for the text to be visible, and nothing more?
> > I keep getting annoyed with the need to have 100% width <embed>
> > objects all over the place.
>
> The reason it's 100% is that it won't cause scrollbars when you make
> the window smaller, the text should "simply" disappear. As I want to
> add reflow support when the font size and window size change, this
> might no longer be needed.


That would be a dream come true ;)

Kind regards,
>
> --
> Mark Wubben
> http://novemberborn.net/
>
>
>
>


-- 
Fredrik Bränström
http://fredrik.branstrom.nu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.novemberborn.net/pipermail/sifr3-dev/attachments/20060806/958f37fb/attachment.htm 


More information about the sifr3-dev mailing list